Design Automation Conference 2009, AUSTIN, USA: Seven companies/organizations will be demonstrating significant progress advancing design flow interoperability in the Silicon Integration Initiative (Si2) Booth #1400 at the Design Automation Conference on July 26-31, at the Moscone Convention Center in San Francisco, CA.
These companies will be showing how Si2 standards such as OpenAccess, the Common Power Format (CPF), the Open Modeling Interface and new Design for Manufacturability techniques can provide innovative approaches to critical IC design flow issues.
The Design for Manufacturability demos will feature the top four EDA companies, two large IDMs, two startups and one research consortium that represents seven large Japanese companies and three Japanese Universities -– all working together!
AnaGlobe Technology: will demonstrate their OpenAccess-based integrated solution, customizable framework, supporting three scripting languages: TCL, Perl, and Python. Its second generation constraint-based OA Pcell Designer provides more powerful functions with a more friendly user interface which supports mixed use of TCL, Perl, and Python, and GUI.
Cadence Design Systems: will demonstrate solutions using several widely-deployed Si2 standards -- OpenAccess, Common Power Format, and ECSM. Hear from experts how you can use these industry-leading solutions from Cadence to address your most challenging mixed-signal, low-power, or advanced-node design problems.
Design for Manufacturability Coalition: will show two demos in the Si2 booth, supported by nine companies, including leading EDA vendors, large IDMs, startups and a research organization.
These demos will show: (1) Cell Level Find and Fix Demo that analyzes and corrects the DFM hotspots inside of approximately 100 different standard Open Cells; (2) Block Level Find and Fix Demo that analyzes and corrects the DFM hotspots in the routing between Open Cells with a ~100K+ gates (50K instances) Block. These demos will detail the standards that are in development that were used such as: Standard DRC checking, Standard Litho checking, Generic Litho Models, and Hotspot Interface Format
Magma Design Automation: will provide an overview of the Talus low-power design flow which provides the “Fastest Path to Silicon.” The Talus implementation system has enabled designers to meet the low-power specifications of some of the world’s most advanced handheld devices.
With support for the Common Power Format (CPF) and a unified datamodel architecture, Talus allows designers to implement advanced low-power design techniques throughout the flow and to significantly reduce turnaround time.
Pyxis Technology: will demonstrate the power of OpenAccess Interoperability through a seamless integration of the NexusRoute-HPC router with the Laker Custom Layout Automation System from SpringSoft. The demonstration will highlight the ability of the router and editor to simultaneously work off the same OpenAccess in-memory runtime model, a first for the EDA industry! Pyxis will be demonstrating Monday through Wednesday each morning from 9:00AM to 12:00 at the Si2 booth.
Open Modeling Coalition: will demonstrate the Open Model Interface (OMI) integrated with a third party timer, IBM's EinsTimer. The OMI enables a consistent view and use of various models across applications, thus allowing tools in multi-vendor design flows to better correlate with each other.
The interface leverages the Open Access API and data model and is extensible to allow for a variety of design models such as Liberty, ECSM and statistical ECSM among others.
The Si2 booth demonstration will use the OMI to connect the EinsTimer timing application with timing models using Liberty, ECSM and IEEE 1481 DPCM formats, separately and within the same timing run.
The Coalition will also demonstrate a multi-vendor standard cell library characterization and validation flow. The library being characterized is the Nangate Open library available on the Si2 website at http://www.si2.org/openeda.si2.org/projects/nangatelib/. Examples of the steps in the characterization process by Nangate, Altos, and Fenix will be shown in the booth.
Also being shown will be examples of characterization setup information that can be included in Liberty files and will lead to more standard characterization setups for any library characterization, validation, and model verification flow.
Synopsys: will demonstrate Galaxy Custom Designer: Built from the ground up on OpenAccess, Custom Designer was architected for productivity. This demonstration will show how our comprehensive solution addresses every step of the AMS IC implementation flow.
Productivity innovations in the schematic editor, simulation and analysis environment and schematic driven layout applications will be highlighted throughout the demo. You will also see how Custom Designer's optimized integration with IC Compiler, HSPICE, CustomSim, WaveView Analyzer, Hercules DRC/LVS and Star-RCXT parasitic extraction provides a productive solution all on the industry's most open environment.
Showing posts with label Magma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magma. Show all posts
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Monday, June 22, 2009
Magma's Vivek Raghavan is new MD, India Operations
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc. today announced the appointment of Vivek Raghavan as Managing Director of the company's India operations.
Raghavan will report to Roy E. Jewell, Magma President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as continue his current responsibility as Vice-president of Magma's Custom Design Business Unit, managing development of physical verification products.
“India is a key part of Magma’s overall strategy and we are looking to Vivek to continue working with our team there to expand the company’s role in India’s EDA fabric,” said Rajeev Madhavan, Magma’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “He has been one of our senior managers in India and I expect he will work with our talented employees to continue the India operation’s success.”
Nearly 30 percent of Magma’s worldwide workforce operates in the company’s Bangalore, Mumbai and Noida facilities.
“Recent developments in Magma products demonstrate great technology and strong competitiveness," Raghavan said. “I’m very pleased to continue working with the team in India that has helped make these advancements possible.”
Vivek joined Magma in 2004 when it acquired Mojave Design, where he was Co-founder & CEO. Prior experience includes senior engineering management positions with Synopsys and Avant! Corporation, where he developed and managed successful products in physical design and parasitic extraction of integrated circuits. He holds a B.Tech degree in Electrical Engineering from IIT-Delhi and a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer engineering from Carnegie Mellon University.
Raghavan will report to Roy E. Jewell, Magma President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as continue his current responsibility as Vice-president of Magma's Custom Design Business Unit, managing development of physical verification products.
“India is a key part of Magma’s overall strategy and we are looking to Vivek to continue working with our team there to expand the company’s role in India’s EDA fabric,” said Rajeev Madhavan, Magma’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “He has been one of our senior managers in India and I expect he will work with our talented employees to continue the India operation’s success.”
Nearly 30 percent of Magma’s worldwide workforce operates in the company’s Bangalore, Mumbai and Noida facilities.
“Recent developments in Magma products demonstrate great technology and strong competitiveness," Raghavan said. “I’m very pleased to continue working with the team in India that has helped make these advancements possible.”
Vivek joined Magma in 2004 when it acquired Mojave Design, where he was Co-founder & CEO. Prior experience includes senior engineering management positions with Synopsys and Avant! Corporation, where he developed and managed successful products in physical design and parasitic extraction of integrated circuits. He holds a B.Tech degree in Electrical Engineering from IIT-Delhi and a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer engineering from Carnegie Mellon University.
Labels:
EDA,
EDA Tools,
Magma,
Magma Design Automation,
Vivek Raghavan
Friday, June 12, 2009
Magma's QuickCap NX certified to support TSMC iRCX format for 40nm
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced that QuickCap NX has been certified to support the parasitic extraction and modeling accuracy requirements of the TSMC iRCX format for ICs targeting 65nm and 40nm processes.
With the consistent data provided by the iRCX format, designers can use Magma QuickCap NX to extract accurate parasitic-capacitance values based on the truest 3D representation of the physical circuit. Accurate capacitance values are critical for calculating many properties of chip performance, including capacitive crosstalk, RC delay time and power consumption.
With QuickCap NX and the iRCX format, designers can more accurately predict IC performance prior to manufacturing, allowing them to either make modifications or proceed with confidence in achieving silicon success.
The TSMC iRCX is an interoperable interconnect modeling data format that ensures the accuracy of resistance/capacitance (RC) extractors, electromigration (EM) tools, power integrity analysis tools and electromagnetic simulators. iRCX is the first of several interoperable EDA interface formats co-developed between TSMC and its design tool partners as part of the TSMC Open Innovation Platform (OIP).
“At the 40nm and 65nm nodes, the ability to generate accurate interconnect models at a high frequency can create a bottleneck in the design flow,” said Tom Quan, deputy director, Design Service Marketing at TSMC. “By working together to qualify QuickCap NX for TSMC iRCX format, TSMC and Magma ensure designers have the most accurate models, breaking design flow bottlenecks and enabling first-pass design success.”
“TSMC has been using QuickCap NX as the standard deviation comparison target for RC extraction tools on special pattern structures and real design samples,” said Premal Buch, general manager of Magma’s Design Implementation Business Unit. “The TSMC qualification of QuickCap NX for the iRCX format provides our mutual customers with further confidence that Magma’s 3D field solver is the industry gold standard for parasitic extraction.”
QuickCap NX: Gold standard in parasitic extraction
QuickCap NX is used by major semiconductor companies as the reference standard for parasitic extraction. It is a highly accurate 3D extractor that precisely models advanced process effects such as optimal proximity correction (OPC), chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) and trapezoidal wires.
QuickCap NX is proven to closely correlate to exact analytical solutions and silicon measurements, delivering capacitance values that are within 1 percent of silicon measurements.
It provides dial-in accuracy and error-bounds reporting on each net, giving the user complete control and trust in the accuracy of results. Leading foundries have validated QuickCap NX's ability to more closely match silicon measurements. By taking process effects into account, the average difference between QuickCap NX capacitance values and actual silicon measurements has been reduced from 9.79 percent to just 0.11 percent.
QuickCap NX in the Magma flow
QuickCap NX can be used for post-layout analysis in the Magma flow. QuickCap technology is also incorporated into the Talus physical design software system to support highly accurate timing and noise analysis during chip implementation. It is used to compute the highly accurate capacitance rules used within Talus and the Quartz RC sign-off extraction tool.
With the consistent data provided by the iRCX format, designers can use Magma QuickCap NX to extract accurate parasitic-capacitance values based on the truest 3D representation of the physical circuit. Accurate capacitance values are critical for calculating many properties of chip performance, including capacitive crosstalk, RC delay time and power consumption.
With QuickCap NX and the iRCX format, designers can more accurately predict IC performance prior to manufacturing, allowing them to either make modifications or proceed with confidence in achieving silicon success.
The TSMC iRCX is an interoperable interconnect modeling data format that ensures the accuracy of resistance/capacitance (RC) extractors, electromigration (EM) tools, power integrity analysis tools and electromagnetic simulators. iRCX is the first of several interoperable EDA interface formats co-developed between TSMC and its design tool partners as part of the TSMC Open Innovation Platform (OIP).
“At the 40nm and 65nm nodes, the ability to generate accurate interconnect models at a high frequency can create a bottleneck in the design flow,” said Tom Quan, deputy director, Design Service Marketing at TSMC. “By working together to qualify QuickCap NX for TSMC iRCX format, TSMC and Magma ensure designers have the most accurate models, breaking design flow bottlenecks and enabling first-pass design success.”
“TSMC has been using QuickCap NX as the standard deviation comparison target for RC extraction tools on special pattern structures and real design samples,” said Premal Buch, general manager of Magma’s Design Implementation Business Unit. “The TSMC qualification of QuickCap NX for the iRCX format provides our mutual customers with further confidence that Magma’s 3D field solver is the industry gold standard for parasitic extraction.”
QuickCap NX: Gold standard in parasitic extraction
QuickCap NX is used by major semiconductor companies as the reference standard for parasitic extraction. It is a highly accurate 3D extractor that precisely models advanced process effects such as optimal proximity correction (OPC), chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) and trapezoidal wires.
QuickCap NX is proven to closely correlate to exact analytical solutions and silicon measurements, delivering capacitance values that are within 1 percent of silicon measurements.
It provides dial-in accuracy and error-bounds reporting on each net, giving the user complete control and trust in the accuracy of results. Leading foundries have validated QuickCap NX's ability to more closely match silicon measurements. By taking process effects into account, the average difference between QuickCap NX capacitance values and actual silicon measurements has been reduced from 9.79 percent to just 0.11 percent.
QuickCap NX in the Magma flow
QuickCap NX can be used for post-layout analysis in the Magma flow. QuickCap technology is also incorporated into the Talus physical design software system to support highly accurate timing and noise analysis during chip implementation. It is used to compute the highly accurate capacitance rules used within Talus and the Quartz RC sign-off extraction tool.
Labels:
40nm,
65nm,
Magma,
QuickCap NX,
TSMC,
TSMC iRCX format
Friday, May 29, 2009
NVIDIA deploys Magma Talus 1.1 into production
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced that NVIDIA Corp. deployed Magma’s Talus 1.1 IC implementation system into full production.
Talus 1.1 offers significant improvements in routing, optimization and runtime as well as enhanced usability features. NVIDIA had been participating in the beta testing of the latest Talus release and, based on the positive results of the testing and improved flow performance, made the decision to start using Talus 1.1 for NVIDIA’s production design projects.
“We have recently upgraded to Talus 1.1 in our production environment based on significant improvements in the core algorithms, flow convergence and the overall usability,” said Patrick Sproule, manager of VLSI Design for NVIDIA. “In particular, the improvements in runtime, timing convergence and ECO routing have improved our throughput and quality of results.”
Magma’s unified data model is a key factor in the performance of the Talus chip implementation system. All the implementation and analysis engines in the Talus flow are built around, and have access to, the same data, and as a result flow convergence and turnaround times are shortened and optimization steps can be applied across the flow.
“We made a significant R&D investment in Talus 1.1 with the focus on improving overall performance and convergence while also improving the ease-of-use and efficiency of the system,” said Premal Buch, general manager of Magma’s Design Implementation Business Unit.
“Our customers are implementing very complex chips and need the combination of a powerful, fast, high-quality chip design system that is also easy to drive. We made a specific effort in Talus 1.1 to develop simplified flows that reduce the number of commands required, but still deliver superior results in the finished design. We are very pleased with the fact that Talus 1.1 performed so well for NVIDIA that they have moved it onto their production chip design projects.”
Talus platform
Talus is a completely unified RTL-to-GDSII system for design implementation, with advanced capabilities for nanometer design. To address shorter time-to-market windows, Talus is the first implementation solution to multi-process the entire IC design flow. Its front-end design system provides logic designers with a fast, high-capacity, physically aware synthesis capability.
Its physical design system addresses variability and multimode/multicorner complexity with new optimization, place and route, and clock tree synthesis technology. To reduce leakage and dynamic power, Talus also provides a complete low-power design system. To improve manufacturability and reliability, Talus provides built-in design-for-manufacturing (DFM) features such as redundant via insertion, recommended end-of-line extension, and wire spreading & widening.
Talus 1.1 offers significant improvements in routing, optimization and runtime as well as enhanced usability features. NVIDIA had been participating in the beta testing of the latest Talus release and, based on the positive results of the testing and improved flow performance, made the decision to start using Talus 1.1 for NVIDIA’s production design projects.
“We have recently upgraded to Talus 1.1 in our production environment based on significant improvements in the core algorithms, flow convergence and the overall usability,” said Patrick Sproule, manager of VLSI Design for NVIDIA. “In particular, the improvements in runtime, timing convergence and ECO routing have improved our throughput and quality of results.”
Magma’s unified data model is a key factor in the performance of the Talus chip implementation system. All the implementation and analysis engines in the Talus flow are built around, and have access to, the same data, and as a result flow convergence and turnaround times are shortened and optimization steps can be applied across the flow.
“We made a significant R&D investment in Talus 1.1 with the focus on improving overall performance and convergence while also improving the ease-of-use and efficiency of the system,” said Premal Buch, general manager of Magma’s Design Implementation Business Unit.
“Our customers are implementing very complex chips and need the combination of a powerful, fast, high-quality chip design system that is also easy to drive. We made a specific effort in Talus 1.1 to develop simplified flows that reduce the number of commands required, but still deliver superior results in the finished design. We are very pleased with the fact that Talus 1.1 performed so well for NVIDIA that they have moved it onto their production chip design projects.”
Talus platform
Talus is a completely unified RTL-to-GDSII system for design implementation, with advanced capabilities for nanometer design. To address shorter time-to-market windows, Talus is the first implementation solution to multi-process the entire IC design flow. Its front-end design system provides logic designers with a fast, high-capacity, physically aware synthesis capability.
Its physical design system addresses variability and multimode/multicorner complexity with new optimization, place and route, and clock tree synthesis technology. To reduce leakage and dynamic power, Talus also provides a complete low-power design system. To improve manufacturability and reliability, Talus provides built-in design-for-manufacturing (DFM) features such as redundant via insertion, recommended end-of-line extension, and wire spreading & widening.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Magma's Talus 1.1 RTL-to-GDSII chip implementation system
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc., a provider of chip design software, today announced the release of Talus 1.1, a new RTL-to-GDSII chip implementation system that delivers the fastest timing closure on the largest and most complex semiconductor designs.
Talus 1.1 utilizes the new Talus COre technology, which leverages Magma’s unified data model to perform timing optimization concurrently during routing, thus providing faster overall design closure with better performance and predictability.
This greatly enhances designers’ ability to achieve optimal results across a wide variety of designs -– while minimizing the need for user intervention. Unlike existing routing systems that perform optimization sequentially before and after place and route, and which focus only on layout-oriented routing factors such as design for manufacturability (DFM) or design rule checking (DRC), Talus focuses concurrently on timing and layout-driven metrics during routing.
In addition to its ability to provide the fastest turnaround on large designs, Talus 1.1 introduces the Talus Flow Manager with “out-of-the-box” design flows. Included with the release are out-of-the-box reference flows for RTL-to-GDSII, multi-Vdd, low-power design and high-performance design -– engineers can easily tune the reference flows for specific applications. Talus Flow Manager also introduces a new visual analysis environment, Talus Visual Volcano, that integrates and presents all design and analysis data via a common display.
“For engineers creating ICs at advanced geometries, big chips, or chips where power management is important, Talus is superior to design systems from other EDA vendors,” said Premal Buch, general manager of Magma’s Design Implementation Business Unit.
“The first breakthrough at Magma occurred when we added concurrent optimization to placement in our initial product, Blast Fusion. Our new Talus Core technology raises the bar by adding concurrent optimization to routing, resulting in faster design closure and better timing performance. Unlike other approaches, Talus delivers a level of design speed and efficiency that is ideal for small-geometry designs -– this also makes it ideal for designers creating big chips, those with 5 million gates or more. This will take on greater commercial significance for our customers as an increased portion of their designs target applications such as netbooks, smartphones and embedded devices that require bigger and more complex chips but also must be designed for low power.”
Talus 1.1 was created to deliver optimal quality of results out of the box at advanced process nodes. It has already been used to tape out numerous production chips at 40 nm, and is presently ready for designs at 32 nm and 28 nm. Such technology is commonly found in System-on-a-Chip (SoC) designs, which integrate computing capabilities on a single chip.
Talus COre technology
The heart of the improvements in Talus 1.1 is its Concurrent Optimizing Routing Engine (COre) technology. At advanced geometries, complex resistance effects, increased via resistance and crosstalk can create a large timing disconnect between placed gates and final routing. Dealing with optimization and routing sequentially results in a suboptimal solution with unpredictable results.
Traditional solutions must spend time optimizing the design after routing to get the necessary accuracy, but at the cost of long runtimes. Talus COre focuses on applying the full scope of timing optimization incrementally during routing. Every aspect of the routing algorithms -– from topology generation to layer assignment, track assignment and DRC cleanup -– is timing and crosstalk aware. This allows the design to converge faster and eliminate post-route timing surprises.
Talus COre is coupled with Talus’ SDF-based optimization to remove the need for manual engineering change orders (ECOs) to close timing.
The addition of the Talus COre technology allows Talus 1.1 to deliver optimal quality of results out of the box on advanced process node design challenges. It has already been used to complete production designs where it provided a better than 5 times runtime improvement over competitive solutions and previous Talus versions. In customer beta testing on 40-nm designs ranging from 2 million to 4 million gates, with frequencies from 400 MHz to 800 MHz, Talus 1.1 produced 75 percent better timing with 10 percent fewer vias than the competitive results.
Talus Flow Manager and Visual Volcano
Talus 1.1 also introduces the new Talus Flow Manager that provides an out-of-the-box Talus RTL-to-GDSII design flow tuned to deliver optimal results. Designers can easily customize the reference flow and tailor it to their own needs, developing specific flows for various projects or applications.
Additional reference flows include templates for the implementation of multiple-voltage (MVdd), multiple-mode and multiple-corner (MMMC) designs, as well as low-power and high-performance designs. Ease of use and cost of adoption is dramatically improved through the use of these pre-qualified flows.
The Talus Flow Manager includes the new Talus Visual Volcano, a new technology designed to help designers make better decisions faster. The Talus Visual Volcano analysis environment offers an integrated information display that allows an engineer to quickly track many parameters of the design, including run times, timing, power and area.
MMMC design management is made easier by simplifying the control over active versus reported scenarios, and displaying results for all scenarios concurrently. By consolidating this data into charts and graphs, the Talus Visual Volcano saves time and improves efficiency by removing the need for tedious analysis of log files and textual reports.
Production shipments of Talus 1.1 will begin in June 2009.
Talus 1.1 utilizes the new Talus COre technology, which leverages Magma’s unified data model to perform timing optimization concurrently during routing, thus providing faster overall design closure with better performance and predictability.
This greatly enhances designers’ ability to achieve optimal results across a wide variety of designs -– while minimizing the need for user intervention. Unlike existing routing systems that perform optimization sequentially before and after place and route, and which focus only on layout-oriented routing factors such as design for manufacturability (DFM) or design rule checking (DRC), Talus focuses concurrently on timing and layout-driven metrics during routing.
In addition to its ability to provide the fastest turnaround on large designs, Talus 1.1 introduces the Talus Flow Manager with “out-of-the-box” design flows. Included with the release are out-of-the-box reference flows for RTL-to-GDSII, multi-Vdd, low-power design and high-performance design -– engineers can easily tune the reference flows for specific applications. Talus Flow Manager also introduces a new visual analysis environment, Talus Visual Volcano, that integrates and presents all design and analysis data via a common display.
“For engineers creating ICs at advanced geometries, big chips, or chips where power management is important, Talus is superior to design systems from other EDA vendors,” said Premal Buch, general manager of Magma’s Design Implementation Business Unit.
“The first breakthrough at Magma occurred when we added concurrent optimization to placement in our initial product, Blast Fusion. Our new Talus Core technology raises the bar by adding concurrent optimization to routing, resulting in faster design closure and better timing performance. Unlike other approaches, Talus delivers a level of design speed and efficiency that is ideal for small-geometry designs -– this also makes it ideal for designers creating big chips, those with 5 million gates or more. This will take on greater commercial significance for our customers as an increased portion of their designs target applications such as netbooks, smartphones and embedded devices that require bigger and more complex chips but also must be designed for low power.”
Talus 1.1 was created to deliver optimal quality of results out of the box at advanced process nodes. It has already been used to tape out numerous production chips at 40 nm, and is presently ready for designs at 32 nm and 28 nm. Such technology is commonly found in System-on-a-Chip (SoC) designs, which integrate computing capabilities on a single chip.
Talus COre technology
The heart of the improvements in Talus 1.1 is its Concurrent Optimizing Routing Engine (COre) technology. At advanced geometries, complex resistance effects, increased via resistance and crosstalk can create a large timing disconnect between placed gates and final routing. Dealing with optimization and routing sequentially results in a suboptimal solution with unpredictable results.
Traditional solutions must spend time optimizing the design after routing to get the necessary accuracy, but at the cost of long runtimes. Talus COre focuses on applying the full scope of timing optimization incrementally during routing. Every aspect of the routing algorithms -– from topology generation to layer assignment, track assignment and DRC cleanup -– is timing and crosstalk aware. This allows the design to converge faster and eliminate post-route timing surprises.
Talus COre is coupled with Talus’ SDF-based optimization to remove the need for manual engineering change orders (ECOs) to close timing.
The addition of the Talus COre technology allows Talus 1.1 to deliver optimal quality of results out of the box on advanced process node design challenges. It has already been used to complete production designs where it provided a better than 5 times runtime improvement over competitive solutions and previous Talus versions. In customer beta testing on 40-nm designs ranging from 2 million to 4 million gates, with frequencies from 400 MHz to 800 MHz, Talus 1.1 produced 75 percent better timing with 10 percent fewer vias than the competitive results.
Talus Flow Manager and Visual Volcano
Talus 1.1 also introduces the new Talus Flow Manager that provides an out-of-the-box Talus RTL-to-GDSII design flow tuned to deliver optimal results. Designers can easily customize the reference flow and tailor it to their own needs, developing specific flows for various projects or applications.
Additional reference flows include templates for the implementation of multiple-voltage (MVdd), multiple-mode and multiple-corner (MMMC) designs, as well as low-power and high-performance designs. Ease of use and cost of adoption is dramatically improved through the use of these pre-qualified flows.
The Talus Flow Manager includes the new Talus Visual Volcano, a new technology designed to help designers make better decisions faster. The Talus Visual Volcano analysis environment offers an integrated information display that allows an engineer to quickly track many parameters of the design, including run times, timing, power and area.
MMMC design management is made easier by simplifying the control over active versus reported scenarios, and displaying results for all scenarios concurrently. By consolidating this data into charts and graphs, the Talus Visual Volcano saves time and improves efficiency by removing the need for tedious analysis of log files and textual reports.
Production shipments of Talus 1.1 will begin in June 2009.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Magma’s FineSim SPICE certified for TSMC SPICE tool qualification program
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced that FineSim SPICE has been certified to meet the accuracy, performance and process compatibility requirements of the TSMC SPICE Tool Qualification Program. Designers can now use FineSim SPICE with the TSMC Model Interface (TMI) on any design targeted at TSMC N40 nanometer processes with a higher level of confidence in achieving first-time silicon success.
“The link between FineSim SPICE and TSMC processes has been enhanced,” said Tom Quan, deputy director of Design Services Marketing at TSMC. “Magma’s aggressive adoption of TMI ensures that customers will benefit from further improvements in simulation accuracy and performance.”
“This qualification from TSMC gives our customers more confidence and flexibility in verifying their most challenging designs,” said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma’s Custom Design Business Unit. “Many of our customers have already benefited from increased speed and capacity enabled by FineSim SPICE’s Native Parallel Technology. Now the benefit will be further enhanced when using the TMI with FineSim SPICE and FineSim Pro.”
FineSim SPICE
FineSim SPICE is a SPICE-level simulation analysis tool that incorporates transistor-level simulation analysis capabilities for mixed digital and analog designs. FineSim SPICE is a full SPICE simulation engine with distributed processing that enables customers to simulate large-scale mixed-signal system chips at the transistor level.
By providing increased speed and capacity while maintaining full SPICE accuracy, FineSim SPICE enables designers to simulate advanced circuits –- such as PLLs, ADCs (analog-to-digital converters), DACs (digital-to-analog converters) and gigahertz SERDES (SERializer/DESerializer) –- that they previously would not even attempt using slower traditional SPICE simulators.
“The link between FineSim SPICE and TSMC processes has been enhanced,” said Tom Quan, deputy director of Design Services Marketing at TSMC. “Magma’s aggressive adoption of TMI ensures that customers will benefit from further improvements in simulation accuracy and performance.”
“This qualification from TSMC gives our customers more confidence and flexibility in verifying their most challenging designs,” said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma’s Custom Design Business Unit. “Many of our customers have already benefited from increased speed and capacity enabled by FineSim SPICE’s Native Parallel Technology. Now the benefit will be further enhanced when using the TMI with FineSim SPICE and FineSim Pro.”
FineSim SPICE
FineSim SPICE is a SPICE-level simulation analysis tool that incorporates transistor-level simulation analysis capabilities for mixed digital and analog designs. FineSim SPICE is a full SPICE simulation engine with distributed processing that enables customers to simulate large-scale mixed-signal system chips at the transistor level.
By providing increased speed and capacity while maintaining full SPICE accuracy, FineSim SPICE enables designers to simulate advanced circuits –- such as PLLs, ADCs (analog-to-digital converters), DACs (digital-to-analog converters) and gigahertz SERDES (SERializer/DESerializer) –- that they previously would not even attempt using slower traditional SPICE simulators.
Labels:
FineSim SPICE,
Magma,
SPICE tool qualification program,
TSMC
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Magma launches 'Liberate Me' program for Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS
SAN JOSE, USA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced the availability of the Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS 2009.05 physical verification tools.
This new version dramatically improves designer productivity and includes functionality improvements for advanced process nodes, including 45/40 and 32/28 nanometer, through optimizations specifically targeted for standard multi-core, multi-CPU computers.
To ease adoption, this version offers improved compatibility with third-party legacy physical verification tools. Magma also announced the "Liberate Me" program, enabling engineers to test drive Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS at no charge for 60 days.
When integrated with Magma's Talus platform for digital implementation, Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS can slash one to two weeks off the tapeout cycle by eliminating all iterations between physical design, and physical verification. Timing and design for manufacturing (DFM) surprises are also eliminated because in-situ metal fill, hotspot fixing and other chip finishing operations are performed within Talus.
"Design complexity more than doubles with every process node. Without significant tool enhancements, designer productivity can plummet," said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma's Custom Design Business Unit. "With the performance improvements in the latest release of the Quartz physical verification solutions, Magma extends its technology leadership and enables designers to dramatically shorten project cycles, especially when compared to third-party legacy tools."
"Liberate Me" free trial program
To free designers from the runtime bottlenecks of legacy tools and make it easier for them to leverage the Quartz tools' advanced technology to accelerate physical verification of large ICs (ICs), Magma launched the "Liberate Me" program.
This program offers a free 60-day trial of the latest versions of Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS. Engineers can request the software at www.magma-da.com/liberate-me.
This new version dramatically improves designer productivity and includes functionality improvements for advanced process nodes, including 45/40 and 32/28 nanometer, through optimizations specifically targeted for standard multi-core, multi-CPU computers.
To ease adoption, this version offers improved compatibility with third-party legacy physical verification tools. Magma also announced the "Liberate Me" program, enabling engineers to test drive Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS at no charge for 60 days.
When integrated with Magma's Talus platform for digital implementation, Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS can slash one to two weeks off the tapeout cycle by eliminating all iterations between physical design, and physical verification. Timing and design for manufacturing (DFM) surprises are also eliminated because in-situ metal fill, hotspot fixing and other chip finishing operations are performed within Talus.
"Design complexity more than doubles with every process node. Without significant tool enhancements, designer productivity can plummet," said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma's Custom Design Business Unit. "With the performance improvements in the latest release of the Quartz physical verification solutions, Magma extends its technology leadership and enables designers to dramatically shorten project cycles, especially when compared to third-party legacy tools."
"Liberate Me" free trial program
To free designers from the runtime bottlenecks of legacy tools and make it easier for them to leverage the Quartz tools' advanced technology to accelerate physical verification of large ICs (ICs), Magma launched the "Liberate Me" program.
This program offers a free 60-day trial of the latest versions of Quartz DRC and Quartz LVS. Engineers can request the software at www.magma-da.com/liberate-me.
Labels:
'Liberate Me' program,
EDA,
EDA Tools,
Magma,
Quartz DRC,
Quartz LVS
Friday, May 1, 2009
Magma's Titan ADX adopted by Panasonic for analog circuit optimization
SAN JOSE, USA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced that Panasonic Corp. one of the largest providers of consumer electronics products, has adopted Magma's Titan ADX analog migration and optimization software in its production custom analog design flow.
Panasonic selected Titan ADX because it enables circuit optimization for a given process technology in a matter of hours without lengthy SPICE runs and streamlines analog design porting. With enhanced designer productivity, Panasonic can effectively reduce the time and effort required for analog design development.
"Using Titan ADX we built a methodology for circuit optimization that allows a variety of architectures to be optimized very quickly," said Dr. Shiro Dosho, a senior staff engineer at the Strategic Semiconductor Development Center of Panasonic. "Analog optimization has historically been a difficult problem due to the large number of design parameters to solve for simultaneously. Titan ADX addresses this problem by identifying the types of circuits that provide better performance -- before circuit design begins. By providing this information up front, Titan ADX enables us to avoid design iterations and helps us meet our time-to-market goals. In addition, with Titan ADX we can not only reduce area, but also minimize power consumption of large, complex analog designs. Titan ADX enables our designers to obtain optimized results over multiple process conditions in a few days -- previous approaches would have taken many weeks."
"Analog design methodologies have not kept pace with digital design. As more ICs incorporate analog components, designers demand more effective and productive analog design tools," said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma's Custom Design Business Unit. "With a unique model-based approach, Titan ADX performs circuit optimization and porting in a fraction of the time required by simulation-based techniques. Panasonic's decision to deploy Titan ADX in its analog design flow highlights this tool's ability to address the challenges of analog and mixed-signal design."
Titan ADX: Streamlining analog design optimization and porting
Titan ADX, an integral part of Magma's Titan mixed-signal design platform, focuses on solving analog/mixed-signal design, optimization and porting challenges. The Titan ADX model-based approach allows circuit optimization and porting in a fraction of the time required by simulation-based techniques.
The technology enables product groups to push the design envelope for extreme performance, to center the design for multiple process, voltage and temperature (PVT) corner cases, and to reduce power and jitter. In addition to providing an efficient and predictable method to store analog circuits, Titan ADX reduces design porting time from several weeks to days.
Panasonic selected Titan ADX because it enables circuit optimization for a given process technology in a matter of hours without lengthy SPICE runs and streamlines analog design porting. With enhanced designer productivity, Panasonic can effectively reduce the time and effort required for analog design development.
"Using Titan ADX we built a methodology for circuit optimization that allows a variety of architectures to be optimized very quickly," said Dr. Shiro Dosho, a senior staff engineer at the Strategic Semiconductor Development Center of Panasonic. "Analog optimization has historically been a difficult problem due to the large number of design parameters to solve for simultaneously. Titan ADX addresses this problem by identifying the types of circuits that provide better performance -- before circuit design begins. By providing this information up front, Titan ADX enables us to avoid design iterations and helps us meet our time-to-market goals. In addition, with Titan ADX we can not only reduce area, but also minimize power consumption of large, complex analog designs. Titan ADX enables our designers to obtain optimized results over multiple process conditions in a few days -- previous approaches would have taken many weeks."
"Analog design methodologies have not kept pace with digital design. As more ICs incorporate analog components, designers demand more effective and productive analog design tools," said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma's Custom Design Business Unit. "With a unique model-based approach, Titan ADX performs circuit optimization and porting in a fraction of the time required by simulation-based techniques. Panasonic's decision to deploy Titan ADX in its analog design flow highlights this tool's ability to address the challenges of analog and mixed-signal design."
Titan ADX: Streamlining analog design optimization and porting
Titan ADX, an integral part of Magma's Titan mixed-signal design platform, focuses on solving analog/mixed-signal design, optimization and porting challenges. The Titan ADX model-based approach allows circuit optimization and porting in a fraction of the time required by simulation-based techniques.
The technology enables product groups to push the design envelope for extreme performance, to center the design for multiple process, voltage and temperature (PVT) corner cases, and to reduce power and jitter. In addition to providing an efficient and predictable method to store analog circuits, Titan ADX reduces design porting time from several weeks to days.
Labels:
analog circuit optimization,
Magma,
Panasonic,
Titan ADX
Panasonic selects Magma’s FineSim SPICE for verification of large analog IP designs
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced that Panasonic Corp., one of the largest providers of consumer electronics products, standardized on Magma’s FineSim SPICE simulator with scalable multi-CPU technology for verification of large analog IP designs.
With FineSim SPICE in the production analog design flow, Panasonic designers have access to fast, accurate, high-capacity SPICE simulation technology that enables them to verify circuit performance of designs that previously were too large and complex to simulate. The ability to accurately predict performance of these large analog designs prior to manufacturing reduces the time and effort required for IC development and fabrication.
“Designing many different types of analog circuits requires very accurate SPICE simulations,” said Dr. Shiro Dosho, senior staff engineer of the Strategic Semiconductor Development Center of Panasonic. “Because of their extremely sensitive nature, verifying complex analog designs typically takes several weeks with SPICE simulators, if they can be simulated at all. With FineSim SPICE, we have seen effective speedup compared with a conventional SPICE simulator, while simulating much larger circuits never before practical in SPICE simulation – and we can verify our designs over multiple conditions.”
“Leveraging Magma’s Native Parallel TechnologyTM FineSim SPICE offers truly scalable multi-CPU performance and capacity while delivering silicon-accurate results,” said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma’s Custom Design Business Unit. “This enables our customers to manufacture their ICs with confidence in meeting expected profit margins. We are pleased that Panasonic is standardizing on our technology for their most challenging consumer ICs.”
FineSim SPICE: Fast and accurate simulation
FineSim SPICE is a SPICE-level simulation analysis tool that incorporates transistor-level simulation analysis capabilities for mixed digital and analog designs.
FineSim SPICE is a full SPICE simulation engine with distributed processing that enables customers to simulate large-scale mixed-signal system chips at the transistor level. By providing increased speed and capacity while maintaining full SPICE accuracy, FineSim SPICE enables designers to simulate advanced circuits -– such as PLLs, ADCs (analog-to-digital converters), DACs (digital-to-analog converters) and gigahertz SERDES (SERializer/DESerializer) -– that they previously would not even attempt using slower traditional SPICE simulators.
With FineSim SPICE in the production analog design flow, Panasonic designers have access to fast, accurate, high-capacity SPICE simulation technology that enables them to verify circuit performance of designs that previously were too large and complex to simulate. The ability to accurately predict performance of these large analog designs prior to manufacturing reduces the time and effort required for IC development and fabrication.
“Designing many different types of analog circuits requires very accurate SPICE simulations,” said Dr. Shiro Dosho, senior staff engineer of the Strategic Semiconductor Development Center of Panasonic. “Because of their extremely sensitive nature, verifying complex analog designs typically takes several weeks with SPICE simulators, if they can be simulated at all. With FineSim SPICE, we have seen effective speedup compared with a conventional SPICE simulator, while simulating much larger circuits never before practical in SPICE simulation – and we can verify our designs over multiple conditions.”
“Leveraging Magma’s Native Parallel TechnologyTM FineSim SPICE offers truly scalable multi-CPU performance and capacity while delivering silicon-accurate results,” said Anirudh Devgan, general manager of Magma’s Custom Design Business Unit. “This enables our customers to manufacture their ICs with confidence in meeting expected profit margins. We are pleased that Panasonic is standardizing on our technology for their most challenging consumer ICs.”
FineSim SPICE: Fast and accurate simulation
FineSim SPICE is a SPICE-level simulation analysis tool that incorporates transistor-level simulation analysis capabilities for mixed digital and analog designs.
FineSim SPICE is a full SPICE simulation engine with distributed processing that enables customers to simulate large-scale mixed-signal system chips at the transistor level. By providing increased speed and capacity while maintaining full SPICE accuracy, FineSim SPICE enables designers to simulate advanced circuits -– such as PLLs, ADCs (analog-to-digital converters), DACs (digital-to-analog converters) and gigahertz SERDES (SERializer/DESerializer) -– that they previously would not even attempt using slower traditional SPICE simulators.
Magma congratulates winners of MUSIC India “Best Paper” Awards"
BANGALORE, INDIA: Magma Design Automation Inc. announced the “Best Paper” winners for MUSIC (Magma Users Summit on Integrated Circuits) India, held April 16.
The top paper award went to Sai Dhiraj Korada of Qualcomm for his paper entitled “Multi-Mode/Multi-Corner Techniques for 45-nm Designs Using Talus.” The second place award went to Thrivikraman M of Rambus for “A Configurable and Automated Approach for High-Speed, Custom-Digital Design.” The third place was jointly awarded to Arun Kothiyar of Texas Instruments for “The Talus Sign-Off Flow and Optimization Methodology” and Murali Rajagopalan of Open Silicon India for “Concurrent Leakage Power and Timing Optimization Using Talus.”
The winning papers were selected by conference attendees and the MUSIC Technical Program Committee from a field of papers presented by Magma users from leading technology companies, including ARM, Qualcomm and Texas Instruments.
“Of the five events I’ve chaired so far, MUSIC India 2009 was one of the best,” said Professor V. Kamkoti of Indian Institute of Technology, Madras and MUSIC India Chairman. “The abstracts submitted were brilliant, indicating that the semiconductor industry in India is indeed working on cutting-edge designs and issues. The abstracts that we selected for presentation attracted many thought-provoking questions from the audience, and some of them revealed very interesting issues for research.”
“India is emerging as a key technology and design hub for integrated circuits,” said Vivek Raghavan, vice president of R&D, Magma India. “We’re seeing more complex analog and digital designs, and also more physical design being done in India. The papers presented at MUSIC India on these topics gave designers the opportunity to connect, share challenges, experiences and expertise related to cutting-edge design techniques.”
The top paper award went to Sai Dhiraj Korada of Qualcomm for his paper entitled “Multi-Mode/Multi-Corner Techniques for 45-nm Designs Using Talus.” The second place award went to Thrivikraman M of Rambus for “A Configurable and Automated Approach for High-Speed, Custom-Digital Design.” The third place was jointly awarded to Arun Kothiyar of Texas Instruments for “The Talus Sign-Off Flow and Optimization Methodology” and Murali Rajagopalan of Open Silicon India for “Concurrent Leakage Power and Timing Optimization Using Talus.”
The winning papers were selected by conference attendees and the MUSIC Technical Program Committee from a field of papers presented by Magma users from leading technology companies, including ARM, Qualcomm and Texas Instruments.
“Of the five events I’ve chaired so far, MUSIC India 2009 was one of the best,” said Professor V. Kamkoti of Indian Institute of Technology, Madras and MUSIC India Chairman. “The abstracts submitted were brilliant, indicating that the semiconductor industry in India is indeed working on cutting-edge designs and issues. The abstracts that we selected for presentation attracted many thought-provoking questions from the audience, and some of them revealed very interesting issues for research.”
“India is emerging as a key technology and design hub for integrated circuits,” said Vivek Raghavan, vice president of R&D, Magma India. “We’re seeing more complex analog and digital designs, and also more physical design being done in India. The papers presented at MUSIC India on these topics gave designers the opportunity to connect, share challenges, experiences and expertise related to cutting-edge design techniques.”
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Top 10 captivating moments in Indian semicon during 2008
Yes, the time has come for all of us to say goodbye to this year. It has been a very captivating year for the Indian semiconductor industry. Some consider it to be a year the industry came of age, while some others would look at the year as one where fab promises failed India.
Nevertheless, as I've maintained, having or not having a fab won't affect India very much as its traditional strengths have been in embedded and design services.
There have been several moments during the year that I personally savor. In fact, I have either witnessed most of those or written/blogged about them.
The top 10 captivating moments in Indian semiconductors during 2008, according to me, are:
1. S. Janakiraman, former chairman, ISA, declared before the world, in May at Dubai, during the IEF 2008, about India's growing strength in global telecom.
2. Growing interest in the solar photovoltaic industry in India, and subsequent proposals made by various companies, including Reliance.
3. EDA companies, such as Magma and also Synopsys, making their entry, or at least, intentions known, in the solar/PV industry.
4. Intel's new chip, designed largely in Bangalore, and of course, the Intel Developer Forum in Taipei, Taiwan.
5. Visit of a strong Japanese delegation to Bangalore, which showed remarkable keenness regarding possible investments in India.
6. BV Naidu quitting SemIndia, and putting in doubt India's fab story. Well, that's a different story, and one person's exit would not mean much to such a large industry.
7. ISA Excite, and the minister announcing that Karnataka could have its own semiconductor policy. The policy should be out in the new year, hopefully.
8. AMD's new chip, the Shanghai, which again, had a lot of involvement from AMD's Bangalore team.
9. NXP India achieving RF CMOS in a single chip. The entire analog and RF work was done in Bangalore, India.
10. Go parallel or perish, said James Reinders, of Intel! Parallelism or parallel computing involves the simultaneous use of more than one computer or processor to execute a program.
I was also present during the launch of Synopsys' Galaxy Custom Designer, which tackles the analog mixed-signal (AMS) challenges. It would occupy a joint 10th position.
There may have been some other moments as well! Would like to hear from all of you what are those other great times in India semiconductor industry during 2008!
Nevertheless, as I've maintained, having or not having a fab won't affect India very much as its traditional strengths have been in embedded and design services.
There have been several moments during the year that I personally savor. In fact, I have either witnessed most of those or written/blogged about them.
The top 10 captivating moments in Indian semiconductors during 2008, according to me, are:
1. S. Janakiraman, former chairman, ISA, declared before the world, in May at Dubai, during the IEF 2008, about India's growing strength in global telecom.
2. Growing interest in the solar photovoltaic industry in India, and subsequent proposals made by various companies, including Reliance.
3. EDA companies, such as Magma and also Synopsys, making their entry, or at least, intentions known, in the solar/PV industry.
4. Intel's new chip, designed largely in Bangalore, and of course, the Intel Developer Forum in Taipei, Taiwan.
5. Visit of a strong Japanese delegation to Bangalore, which showed remarkable keenness regarding possible investments in India.
6. BV Naidu quitting SemIndia, and putting in doubt India's fab story. Well, that's a different story, and one person's exit would not mean much to such a large industry.
7. ISA Excite, and the minister announcing that Karnataka could have its own semiconductor policy. The policy should be out in the new year, hopefully.
8. AMD's new chip, the Shanghai, which again, had a lot of involvement from AMD's Bangalore team.
9. NXP India achieving RF CMOS in a single chip. The entire analog and RF work was done in Bangalore, India.
10. Go parallel or perish, said James Reinders, of Intel! Parallelism or parallel computing involves the simultaneous use of more than one computer or processor to execute a program.
I was also present during the launch of Synopsys' Galaxy Custom Designer, which tackles the analog mixed-signal (AMS) challenges. It would occupy a joint 10th position.
There may have been some other moments as well! Would like to hear from all of you what are those other great times in India semiconductor industry during 2008!
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Mentor on EDA trends and solar/PV
This is a continuation of my recent discussion with Joseph Sawicki, vice president & GM, Design to Silicon Division, Mentor Graphics.
There have been whispers that the EDA industry has been presently lagging behind semiconductors and is in the catch-up mode. "That’s a matter of perspective. There are definitely unsolved challenges at 32nm and 22nm, but the reality is that we are still in the technology development stage," he says.
For EDA tools that address implementation and manufacturing issues (i.e., Mentor design-to-silicon products), there are dependencies that cannot be fully resolved until the process technology has stabilized. Mentor Graphics is laying the groundwork for those challenges and working in concert with the process technology leaders to ensure that our products address all issues and are production-worthy before the process technology goes mainstream.
On the other hand, although Mentor’s products are fully-qualified for 45nm, there have only been a handful of tapeouts at that node, so for the majority of customers, we are ahead of the curve.
On ESL and DFM as growth drivers
ESL and DFM are said to be the new growth drivers. Sawicki adds: "As Wally Rhines has said in his public presentations, system level design and IC implementation are the stages of development where there are the most challenges, and therefore the most opportunities. To continue the traditional grow spiral that the electronic industry has enjoyed as a result of device scaling, we need more sophisticated EDA solutions to deal with both of these challenges."
ESL is responding to the growth of design complexity and the need for earlier and more thorough design verification, including low power characteristics, and software integration.
The Design-to-Silicon division is addressing the issues of IC implementation which result not only from the increase in design complexity and devices sizes, but also from increasing sensitivity of the manufacturing process to physical design decisions, a phenomenon often referred to as “manufacturing variability.”
Although the term “Design-For-Manufacturing” reflects the need to consider manufacturability in design and to optimize for both functional and parametric yield, it is important to emphasize that DFM is not simply an additional tool or discrete step in the design process, but rather an integration of manufacturing process information throughout the IC implementation flow.
With single threading, we can no longer handle designs over 100 million gates. Of course, at 45nm, you can do a 100mn gates. That rewriting process is another issue that is also slowing out. It would be interesting to see how is Mentor handling this.
According to Sawicki, Mentor has incorporated sophisticated multi-threading and multi-processing technologies into all of its performance-sensitive applications, from place-and-route, through physical verification, resolution enhancement and testing.
He says, "Our tools have a track record of impressive and consistent and performance and scalability improvements, which is why we continue to lead the industry in performance."
In addition to merely adding multi-threading and support for multi-core processors, Calibre products have a robust workflow management environment that automatically distributes the processing workload in the most efficient manner across any number of available clustered computing nodes.
Mentor's Olympus-SoC place-and-route is inherently scalable due to its advanced architecture which includes an extremely efficient graph representation for timing information, and a very concise memory footprint. In addition, all the engines within Olympus-SoC can take advantage of multi-threaded and multi-core processors for high performance. These features enable Olympus-SoC to handle 100M+ gates designs in flat mode without excessive turnaround time.
Mentor’s ATPG tools are also designed to operate in multiprocessing mode over the multiple computing platforms to reduce test pattern generation time. In addition, Mentor test pattern compression technology reduces test pattern volume and test time, making it feasible to fully test 100M gate devices and maintain product quality without an explosion in test cost.
With EDA is starting to move up to the system level, will this make EDA less dependent on the semiconductor world?
Sawicki agrees that there are challenges at both the front end and back end of the electronic products design and manufacturing life cycle. Both of these opportunities are growing. In addition, developments like multi-level (3D) die packaging, through-silicon via (TSV) structures and other non-traditional techniques for device scaling are pushing system and silicon design issues closer together.
Reaching the 22nm node will require highly compute intensive EDA techniques for physical design to compensate for limitations in the manufacturing process. Beyond that, we could see a major shift to new materials and manufacturing techniques that would open new green fields for EDA in the IC implementation flow.
EDA going forward
How does Mentor see the EDA industry evolving, going forward?
Sawicki adds: "There are three key trends to watch. Firstly, for design to remain affordable at the leading edge, we need to enable radical increases in productivity. Electronic System Level (ESL) design is the key here, allowing designers to move to a new level of abstraction for both design and verification.
"Secondly, the challenges of manufacturing a well-yielding and reliable device as we move to 22nm will require a far more sophisticated physical implementation environment—one that accounts for physical effects in the design loop, and accounts for manufacturing variability in it's optimization routines.
"Finally, the manufacturing challenges also open significant opportunity for EDA in the manufacturing space. A great example of this is the September 17, 2008 announcement we did with IBM on a joint development program to enable manufacturing at the 22nm node."
Finally, given the roles already defined by Magma and Synopsys in solar, is there an opportunity for EDA in solar/PV?
According to Sawicki, as the photovoltaic devices have very simple and regular structures, most of the opportunity for EDA is not in logic design tools, but in material science, transistor-level device modeling, and manufacturing efficiencies with a focus on conversion efficiency and manufacturing cost reduction.
EDA's role in solar will be in the newer areas related to Design-for-Manufacturing and other manufacturing optimizations, he concludes.
Our last discussion on DFM will follow in a later blog post!
There have been whispers that the EDA industry has been presently lagging behind semiconductors and is in the catch-up mode. "That’s a matter of perspective. There are definitely unsolved challenges at 32nm and 22nm, but the reality is that we are still in the technology development stage," he says.
For EDA tools that address implementation and manufacturing issues (i.e., Mentor design-to-silicon products), there are dependencies that cannot be fully resolved until the process technology has stabilized. Mentor Graphics is laying the groundwork for those challenges and working in concert with the process technology leaders to ensure that our products address all issues and are production-worthy before the process technology goes mainstream.
On the other hand, although Mentor’s products are fully-qualified for 45nm, there have only been a handful of tapeouts at that node, so for the majority of customers, we are ahead of the curve.
On ESL and DFM as growth drivers
ESL and DFM are said to be the new growth drivers. Sawicki adds: "As Wally Rhines has said in his public presentations, system level design and IC implementation are the stages of development where there are the most challenges, and therefore the most opportunities. To continue the traditional grow spiral that the electronic industry has enjoyed as a result of device scaling, we need more sophisticated EDA solutions to deal with both of these challenges."
ESL is responding to the growth of design complexity and the need for earlier and more thorough design verification, including low power characteristics, and software integration.
The Design-to-Silicon division is addressing the issues of IC implementation which result not only from the increase in design complexity and devices sizes, but also from increasing sensitivity of the manufacturing process to physical design decisions, a phenomenon often referred to as “manufacturing variability.”
Although the term “Design-For-Manufacturing” reflects the need to consider manufacturability in design and to optimize for both functional and parametric yield, it is important to emphasize that DFM is not simply an additional tool or discrete step in the design process, but rather an integration of manufacturing process information throughout the IC implementation flow.
With single threading, we can no longer handle designs over 100 million gates. Of course, at 45nm, you can do a 100mn gates. That rewriting process is another issue that is also slowing out. It would be interesting to see how is Mentor handling this.
According to Sawicki, Mentor has incorporated sophisticated multi-threading and multi-processing technologies into all of its performance-sensitive applications, from place-and-route, through physical verification, resolution enhancement and testing.
He says, "Our tools have a track record of impressive and consistent and performance and scalability improvements, which is why we continue to lead the industry in performance."
In addition to merely adding multi-threading and support for multi-core processors, Calibre products have a robust workflow management environment that automatically distributes the processing workload in the most efficient manner across any number of available clustered computing nodes.
Mentor's Olympus-SoC place-and-route is inherently scalable due to its advanced architecture which includes an extremely efficient graph representation for timing information, and a very concise memory footprint. In addition, all the engines within Olympus-SoC can take advantage of multi-threaded and multi-core processors for high performance. These features enable Olympus-SoC to handle 100M+ gates designs in flat mode without excessive turnaround time.
Mentor’s ATPG tools are also designed to operate in multiprocessing mode over the multiple computing platforms to reduce test pattern generation time. In addition, Mentor test pattern compression technology reduces test pattern volume and test time, making it feasible to fully test 100M gate devices and maintain product quality without an explosion in test cost.
With EDA is starting to move up to the system level, will this make EDA less dependent on the semiconductor world?
Sawicki agrees that there are challenges at both the front end and back end of the electronic products design and manufacturing life cycle. Both of these opportunities are growing. In addition, developments like multi-level (3D) die packaging, through-silicon via (TSV) structures and other non-traditional techniques for device scaling are pushing system and silicon design issues closer together.
Reaching the 22nm node will require highly compute intensive EDA techniques for physical design to compensate for limitations in the manufacturing process. Beyond that, we could see a major shift to new materials and manufacturing techniques that would open new green fields for EDA in the IC implementation flow.
EDA going forward
How does Mentor see the EDA industry evolving, going forward?
Sawicki adds: "There are three key trends to watch. Firstly, for design to remain affordable at the leading edge, we need to enable radical increases in productivity. Electronic System Level (ESL) design is the key here, allowing designers to move to a new level of abstraction for both design and verification.
"Secondly, the challenges of manufacturing a well-yielding and reliable device as we move to 22nm will require a far more sophisticated physical implementation environment—one that accounts for physical effects in the design loop, and accounts for manufacturing variability in it's optimization routines.
"Finally, the manufacturing challenges also open significant opportunity for EDA in the manufacturing space. A great example of this is the September 17, 2008 announcement we did with IBM on a joint development program to enable manufacturing at the 22nm node."
Finally, given the roles already defined by Magma and Synopsys in solar, is there an opportunity for EDA in solar/PV?
According to Sawicki, as the photovoltaic devices have very simple and regular structures, most of the opportunity for EDA is not in logic design tools, but in material science, transistor-level device modeling, and manufacturing efficiencies with a focus on conversion efficiency and manufacturing cost reduction.
EDA's role in solar will be in the newer areas related to Design-for-Manufacturing and other manufacturing optimizations, he concludes.
Our last discussion on DFM will follow in a later blog post!
Labels:
22nm,
45nm,
design challenges,
DFM,
EDA,
EDA Tools,
ESL,
Joseph Sawicki,
Magma,
Mentor Graphics,
Semiconductors,
solar/PV,
Synopsys
Friday, September 12, 2008
Synopsys' Dr Chi-Foon Chan on India, low power design and solar
There have been reports about the troubles within the EDA industry in recent times, especially those related with quarter sales. Interestingly, Synopsys has been the one sailing along fine! If that's not enough, it made its intention known of playing a role on the solar/PV segment, an area where lot of investments have been happening!
Given this scenario, I was fortuitous enough, rather, extremely lucky to be able to get into a conversation with Dr. Chi-Foon Chan, President and Chief Operating Officer, Synopsys Inc., during his recent visit to India.
On the state of the global semiconductor industry, he said, it was somewhere now in the low 10s [well below 10 percent]. The EDA industry is currently tracking below that level. However, Synopsys has been growing at around 10 percent. He said, "The technology challenges today are very high."
Synopsys has a substantial number of R&D population based out of India. Giving his assessment of the Indian semiconductor industry, Dr. Chan added: "Our main interest in India is largely talent and the academia. India can very well get more into the product development side. Even the outsourcing of designs have increased. Our capabilities, of the Indian team, have also increased."
As with any good semiconductor ecosystem, the Indian industry also needs a proactive industry association, a role played to near perfection by the ISA (India Semiconductor Association). Acknowledging the ISA's role, Dr. Chan said, "The ISA has also formed a very cohesive team."
There is little doubt about India's growing importance in technology strengths and managerial leadership. Dr. Chan added: "We are more on the high-end side and also track what others design. In India, the profiles of designs are definitely high-end in nature. This is largely due to the presence of a large number of MNCs. A very high percentage of designs are in the 45nm and 65nm process technology nodes."
There is another significant indicator of India's growing importance, and that is the huge rise in the attendance of the SNUG. In 2000, this event attracted 180 people. However, in 2008, the SNUG attracted over 2,000 people.
Moving India to next level
Given the very high level of commitment on Synopsys' part toward India, there was a need to find out from Dr. Chan what exactly India needs to do to move to the next level in the value chain in the semiconductor ecosystem.
He advised: "India can do two to three things. One, for the system to grow, you need the government, academia and industry to grow together. India has all of the ingredients required to drive products."
Comparing India with China, he highlighted the fact that while in China, the local consumption was higher than local supply, that was not the case with India!
"Therefore, looking at merely the local market is not the only thing. Products developed here can also be targeted at the Middle East and Southeast Asia." He was quite forthright in his analysis, adding: "Industries start when you find markets. The skill sets are already present here. There can well be multiple startups."
Dr. Chan also touched upon the fab vs. fabless issue, noting that there could well be more of fabless companies in India. "Building a fab requires lot of capital. Also, consolidation will continue to happen."
What role does Dr. Chan see Synopsys playing in the Indian context? He said: "Synopsys will continue to be a catalyst for the industry. A healthy design industry in India continues to help us. We also work well with the Indian universities. Having more people from the universities will always help. We also invest a lot in application support. The application team also trains others. I now look forward to seeing more fabless companies here and India to become even more global."
On low power design
India is also a centre of expertise in low power design, given that low power is hugely important in today's electronics ecosystem. Dr. Chan commented that low power has always been the number one design issue. It cannot be taken care of at one single stage.
He added: "A slightly new concept that has emerged is low-power verification. There are so many schemes for attacking low power, such as multiple voltage islands. We (Synopsys) are spending a lot of effort in low power.
"As a designer, you require detailed analysis. Low-power verification is now coming up. Another area is testing. As an example, if so much power is required, how do you have the power cut from the tool you are using to test? From a Synopsys point of view, we are involved in several points, such as front-end synthesis, testing, sign-off, verification, etc. We are trying to put in a whole lot of methodologies."
Synopsys in solar
EDA may be able to help by lowering power requirements and leakage on better products. Especially, the Synopsys' TCAD product can be used to create more efficient and effective solar cells. Now, this is not a new development anymore. Synopsys, along with Magma, have already made known their intentions about setting foot in the solar/PV space.
On the TCAD, Dr. Chan said: "We have a very strong position in the TCAD, commercially. Now, it is one of our most critical elements in high-performance. Our TCAD is among the strongest in the EDA industry.
"In solar, it does not have to be a complicated place-and-route, etc. From an entire solar industry point of view, we have now used some effort from TCAD into this space. Heat transfer issues, etc., are more in the EDA space."
I will continue my conversation with Synopsys on its solar initiative sometime later. Keep watching this space, folks
On the state of the global semiconductor industry, he said, it was somewhere now in the low 10s [well below 10 percent]. The EDA industry is currently tracking below that level. However, Synopsys has been growing at around 10 percent. He said, "The technology challenges today are very high."
Synopsys has a substantial number of R&D population based out of India. Giving his assessment of the Indian semiconductor industry, Dr. Chan added: "Our main interest in India is largely talent and the academia. India can very well get more into the product development side. Even the outsourcing of designs have increased. Our capabilities, of the Indian team, have also increased."
As with any good semiconductor ecosystem, the Indian industry also needs a proactive industry association, a role played to near perfection by the ISA (India Semiconductor Association). Acknowledging the ISA's role, Dr. Chan said, "The ISA has also formed a very cohesive team."
There is little doubt about India's growing importance in technology strengths and managerial leadership. Dr. Chan added: "We are more on the high-end side and also track what others design. In India, the profiles of designs are definitely high-end in nature. This is largely due to the presence of a large number of MNCs. A very high percentage of designs are in the 45nm and 65nm process technology nodes."
There is another significant indicator of India's growing importance, and that is the huge rise in the attendance of the SNUG. In 2000, this event attracted 180 people. However, in 2008, the SNUG attracted over 2,000 people.
Moving India to next level
Given the very high level of commitment on Synopsys' part toward India, there was a need to find out from Dr. Chan what exactly India needs to do to move to the next level in the value chain in the semiconductor ecosystem.
He advised: "India can do two to three things. One, for the system to grow, you need the government, academia and industry to grow together. India has all of the ingredients required to drive products."
Comparing India with China, he highlighted the fact that while in China, the local consumption was higher than local supply, that was not the case with India!
"Therefore, looking at merely the local market is not the only thing. Products developed here can also be targeted at the Middle East and Southeast Asia." He was quite forthright in his analysis, adding: "Industries start when you find markets. The skill sets are already present here. There can well be multiple startups."
Dr. Chan also touched upon the fab vs. fabless issue, noting that there could well be more of fabless companies in India. "Building a fab requires lot of capital. Also, consolidation will continue to happen."
What role does Dr. Chan see Synopsys playing in the Indian context? He said: "Synopsys will continue to be a catalyst for the industry. A healthy design industry in India continues to help us. We also work well with the Indian universities. Having more people from the universities will always help. We also invest a lot in application support. The application team also trains others. I now look forward to seeing more fabless companies here and India to become even more global."
On low power design
India is also a centre of expertise in low power design, given that low power is hugely important in today's electronics ecosystem. Dr. Chan commented that low power has always been the number one design issue. It cannot be taken care of at one single stage.
He added: "A slightly new concept that has emerged is low-power verification. There are so many schemes for attacking low power, such as multiple voltage islands. We (Synopsys) are spending a lot of effort in low power.
"As a designer, you require detailed analysis. Low-power verification is now coming up. Another area is testing. As an example, if so much power is required, how do you have the power cut from the tool you are using to test? From a Synopsys point of view, we are involved in several points, such as front-end synthesis, testing, sign-off, verification, etc. We are trying to put in a whole lot of methodologies."
Synopsys in solar
EDA may be able to help by lowering power requirements and leakage on better products. Especially, the Synopsys' TCAD product can be used to create more efficient and effective solar cells. Now, this is not a new development anymore. Synopsys, along with Magma, have already made known their intentions about setting foot in the solar/PV space.
On the TCAD, Dr. Chan said: "We have a very strong position in the TCAD, commercially. Now, it is one of our most critical elements in high-performance. Our TCAD is among the strongest in the EDA industry.
"In solar, it does not have to be a complicated place-and-route, etc. From an entire solar industry point of view, we have now used some effort from TCAD into this space. Heat transfer issues, etc., are more in the EDA space."
I will continue my conversation with Synopsys on its solar initiative sometime later. Keep watching this space, folks
Labels:
Dr. Chi Foon-Chan,
EDA,
EDA Tools,
fabless,
fabs,
global solar industry,
India semiconductor market,
ISA,
low power design,
Magma,
PV,
Semiconductors,
Solar,
solar/PV,
Synopsys,
TCAD
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Magma's YieldManager could make solar 'rock'!
Make no mistake, folks! The EDA guys are getting their act together to penetrate the solar/PV segment!! Magma's YieldManager is a great example of that effort! Yes, we all know the troubles of the EDA industry as well as of the key players. However, let's not ignore this initiative from Magma!
Recently, Magma Design Automation Inc. announced the development of a new yield enhancement software system, the YieldManager software system, which is customized for solar fabs to improve conversion efficiency, increase yield and reduce the manufacturing costs of solar cells.
Magma is collaborating with Pegasus Semiconductor-Solar to refine the product specifications and test the new product, based on Magma's YieldManager.
This is an interesting development, especially from the point of view of the solar/PV industry! Even more significant is the entrance of the EDA community [the one being Synopsys] into solar/PV, a segment, which has witnessed a substantial amount of investments worldwide, and specifically, in India.
It was fun catching up with Ankush Oberai, VP, Failure Analysis Business Unit, Magma Design Automation, in Silicon Valley, to find out more about the YieldManager software system, what it can do for the solar/PV industry, and why Magma decided to venture into an 'unchartered territory'.
The first and most obvious thing, why YieldManager?
Ankush Oberoi says that in semiconductors, yield impacting parameters which are regularly monitored are mostly extrinsic, i.e., from outside, such as particles, over-exposure, under-exposure and miss-processing. In solar cells, the yield impacting parameters are mostly intrinsic, that is, something built into the solar cell material which can NOT be easily seen. Thus, a different "eye" is needed to see the solar parameters. The "eye" is the YieldManager here!!!
It would NOT be either inspection tools or litho optical proximity correction (OPC) detector. The solar cell efficiency is directly influenced by electro-physics of solar materials. A YieldManger is required to monitor any changes in those efficiency impacting parameters.
The most important parameter is the lifetime of current-generating carriers. As the solar energy generates the "hole-electron" pairs, they are collected separately as electricity.
If the solar material is "dirty" with many crystalline boundaries as in thin film solar cells, the solar generated hole-electrons get pulled into those crystalline boundaries and do not contribute to the electricity generation.
"Thus, if we can find a solar yield management system to detect the very subtle change in carrier lifetime, then we are at home with a greatest Home Run in solar cell business," he contends.
Given the EDA background, why did Magma decide on a yield management technology?
He adds that yield management technology was acquired by Magma as part of the Knights Technology acquisition in Nov 2006. Magma's Fab Business Unit (formerly, Knights Technology) is a pioneer (since 1994) in yield management for semiconductor technology.
The product is deployed and used in leading fabs around the world to help manage production wafer yield. Yield management has also been deployed for mask making and LCD productions.
It would be interesting to know how Magma's new product will allow solar fabs to better monitor all metrology, inspection and performance data throughout the manufacturing process.
Oberoi says: "For Si wafer solar cell, the most important parameter to monitor is the solar conversion efficiency impacting parameters. An example would be a carrier lifetime.
"If the carrier lifetime fluctuates more than normal, the solar Yield Manager will quickly examine all of the key data, i.e., metrology, inspection and performance data, to pinpoint out potential root-causes of the fluctuation problem."
For thin film solar cell, particles, laser cutting integrity and film thickness uniformity would be main things to monitor. Those data are quite similarly collected, as in semiconductors, and would be monitored as similar ways. The Solar Yield Manager would do well as proven in semiconductors in this case.
Next, it is important to find out how will the YieldManager enable fab operators to identify and correct root causes of solar-efficiency and yield degradation caused by subtle fab processing fluctuations or instability.
According to Oberoi, the carrier lifetime, which could be caused by various factors, is the most critical parameter to monitor for achieving and maintaining the good solar conversion efficiency.
He says: "As the Solar Yield Manager carefully monitors those factors, blindly committing ~400,000 wafers a day can be eliminated, when critical process instability starts appearing and persists. The solar conversion efficiency impacting factors could be monitored differently by different solar fabs."
Some fabs may not have capabilities to monitor those factors. The Solar Yield Manager would define those metrology and performance tool requirements, when released.
It is also interesting to learn how improving the energy conversion efficiency, reducing the manufacturing costs and increasing the yield of silicon wafer-based solar cells are critical to the growth of the solar market.
Currently, the Si wafer for solar cell costs $2~$2.5/watt due to the severe shortage of Si. The selling price of a solar cell is $3~$3.5/watt, that is, the material cost is 60~70 percent of the solar cell price.
No market or industry would prevail with the 60~70 percent material cost, adds Oberoi. Thus, every milli-watt squeezed out of a solar cell would be very critically important for proliferation of solar industry.
In order to increase the power output of a solar cell, the solar conversion efficiency must be maximized. Once maximized, sustaining the good solar efficiency is the name of the game in the solar cell manufacturing business.
The effective manufacturing cost will be drastically lowered, if bad solar cells with poor solar efficiency is minimally produced. That is, some fabs will use ~400,000 wafers a day to generate ~500 M-Watt a year, whereas some ~450,000 wafers to do the same with poorer solar efficiency.
Innovation in the solar fabrication process must be accelerated, and today, no other enterprise-wide yield enhancement software exists for solar fabs.
Oberoi says: "Solar cell is an old technology, but a very new industry, simply because not enough money was being invested. Now, money is pouring into the solar industry and products like solar Yield will start to appear. It is not known yet that anyone commercially has tried to develop a similar product."
Global estimate of solar/PV industry
There are several publications with recent estimates. The annual solar cell installation in the world: Germany ~46 percent, Japan ~23 percent, USA ~9 percent, Spain ~6 percent, Italy ~4 percent, the rest of Europe ~1 percent, the rest of Asia, including India and China ~6 percent, and the rest of world ~5 percent in 2006.
Magma is currently in the design and implementation stages of the product and plan to have version 1.0 of the product commercially available in Q1-09. The company has targeted solar fabs based in Asia that are eager for early implementation of the solar yield product.
Right then: those planning or having solar fabs! Now's the time to test that home run theory with the YieldManager.
Recently, Magma Design Automation Inc. announced the development of a new yield enhancement software system, the YieldManager software system, which is customized for solar fabs to improve conversion efficiency, increase yield and reduce the manufacturing costs of solar cells.
Magma is collaborating with Pegasus Semiconductor-Solar to refine the product specifications and test the new product, based on Magma's YieldManager.
This is an interesting development, especially from the point of view of the solar/PV industry! Even more significant is the entrance of the EDA community [the one being Synopsys] into solar/PV, a segment, which has witnessed a substantial amount of investments worldwide, and specifically, in India.
It was fun catching up with Ankush Oberai, VP, Failure Analysis Business Unit, Magma Design Automation, in Silicon Valley, to find out more about the YieldManager software system, what it can do for the solar/PV industry, and why Magma decided to venture into an 'unchartered territory'.The first and most obvious thing, why YieldManager?
Ankush Oberoi says that in semiconductors, yield impacting parameters which are regularly monitored are mostly extrinsic, i.e., from outside, such as particles, over-exposure, under-exposure and miss-processing. In solar cells, the yield impacting parameters are mostly intrinsic, that is, something built into the solar cell material which can NOT be easily seen. Thus, a different "eye" is needed to see the solar parameters. The "eye" is the YieldManager here!!!
It would NOT be either inspection tools or litho optical proximity correction (OPC) detector. The solar cell efficiency is directly influenced by electro-physics of solar materials. A YieldManger is required to monitor any changes in those efficiency impacting parameters.
The most important parameter is the lifetime of current-generating carriers. As the solar energy generates the "hole-electron" pairs, they are collected separately as electricity.
If the solar material is "dirty" with many crystalline boundaries as in thin film solar cells, the solar generated hole-electrons get pulled into those crystalline boundaries and do not contribute to the electricity generation.
"Thus, if we can find a solar yield management system to detect the very subtle change in carrier lifetime, then we are at home with a greatest Home Run in solar cell business," he contends.
Given the EDA background, why did Magma decide on a yield management technology?
He adds that yield management technology was acquired by Magma as part of the Knights Technology acquisition in Nov 2006. Magma's Fab Business Unit (formerly, Knights Technology) is a pioneer (since 1994) in yield management for semiconductor technology.
The product is deployed and used in leading fabs around the world to help manage production wafer yield. Yield management has also been deployed for mask making and LCD productions.
It would be interesting to know how Magma's new product will allow solar fabs to better monitor all metrology, inspection and performance data throughout the manufacturing process.
Oberoi says: "For Si wafer solar cell, the most important parameter to monitor is the solar conversion efficiency impacting parameters. An example would be a carrier lifetime.
"If the carrier lifetime fluctuates more than normal, the solar Yield Manager will quickly examine all of the key data, i.e., metrology, inspection and performance data, to pinpoint out potential root-causes of the fluctuation problem."
For thin film solar cell, particles, laser cutting integrity and film thickness uniformity would be main things to monitor. Those data are quite similarly collected, as in semiconductors, and would be monitored as similar ways. The Solar Yield Manager would do well as proven in semiconductors in this case.
Next, it is important to find out how will the YieldManager enable fab operators to identify and correct root causes of solar-efficiency and yield degradation caused by subtle fab processing fluctuations or instability.
According to Oberoi, the carrier lifetime, which could be caused by various factors, is the most critical parameter to monitor for achieving and maintaining the good solar conversion efficiency.
He says: "As the Solar Yield Manager carefully monitors those factors, blindly committing ~400,000 wafers a day can be eliminated, when critical process instability starts appearing and persists. The solar conversion efficiency impacting factors could be monitored differently by different solar fabs."
Some fabs may not have capabilities to monitor those factors. The Solar Yield Manager would define those metrology and performance tool requirements, when released.
It is also interesting to learn how improving the energy conversion efficiency, reducing the manufacturing costs and increasing the yield of silicon wafer-based solar cells are critical to the growth of the solar market.
Currently, the Si wafer for solar cell costs $2~$2.5/watt due to the severe shortage of Si. The selling price of a solar cell is $3~$3.5/watt, that is, the material cost is 60~70 percent of the solar cell price.
No market or industry would prevail with the 60~70 percent material cost, adds Oberoi. Thus, every milli-watt squeezed out of a solar cell would be very critically important for proliferation of solar industry.
In order to increase the power output of a solar cell, the solar conversion efficiency must be maximized. Once maximized, sustaining the good solar efficiency is the name of the game in the solar cell manufacturing business.
The effective manufacturing cost will be drastically lowered, if bad solar cells with poor solar efficiency is minimally produced. That is, some fabs will use ~400,000 wafers a day to generate ~500 M-Watt a year, whereas some ~450,000 wafers to do the same with poorer solar efficiency.
Innovation in the solar fabrication process must be accelerated, and today, no other enterprise-wide yield enhancement software exists for solar fabs.
Oberoi says: "Solar cell is an old technology, but a very new industry, simply because not enough money was being invested. Now, money is pouring into the solar industry and products like solar Yield will start to appear. It is not known yet that anyone commercially has tried to develop a similar product."
Global estimate of solar/PV industry
There are several publications with recent estimates. The annual solar cell installation in the world: Germany ~46 percent, Japan ~23 percent, USA ~9 percent, Spain ~6 percent, Italy ~4 percent, the rest of Europe ~1 percent, the rest of Asia, including India and China ~6 percent, and the rest of world ~5 percent in 2006.
Magma is currently in the design and implementation stages of the product and plan to have version 1.0 of the product commercially available in Q1-09. The company has targeted solar fabs based in Asia that are eager for early implementation of the solar yield product.
Right then: those planning or having solar fabs! Now's the time to test that home run theory with the YieldManager.
Sunday, September 7, 2008
On possible Samsung-SanDisk deal; AMD's fab-lite path
Last week, the global semiconductor industry has been hearing and reading about two big speculative stories:
a) A possible acquisition of SanDisk by Samsung, and
b) A possible chance of AMD taking the fab-lite route.
First on Samsung's buyout (possible) of SanDisk! There have been rumors of a possibility of Samsung acquiring SanDisk. While it is still a possibility, it also leads to several interesting questions!
Should this deal happen, what will be the possible implications for the memory market? Will this also lead to a possible easing off on the pricing pressures on the memory supply chain? And well, what happens to the Toshiba-SanDisk alliance?
A couple of weeks back, iSuppli, had highlighted how Micron had managed to buck the weak NAND market conditions, and was closing the gap with Hynix in Q2, and that NAND recovery was likely only by H2-2009.
I managed to catch up again Nam Hyung Kim, Director & Chief Analyst, iSuppli Corp., and quizzed him on the possible acquisition of SanDisk by Samsung.
A caution: Remember, all of this is merely based on speculation!
On the possibility of Samsung's takeover of SanDisk, he says: "Samsung at least said that they consider it. Thus, it is a possible deal. But who knows!"
Kim is more forthright on the implications for the memory market, should this deal happen, and I tend to agree with him.
Consolidation inevitable; no impact on prices
The chief analyst quips: "The NAND flash market is still premature and there are too many players in flash cards, USB Flash drives, SSD, etc. The industry consolidation should be inevitable in future."
So, will this possible buyout at least ease some pricing pressures on memory supply chain? "I don't expect this deal to impact the prices. Prices will depend on suppliers' capacity plans. In the memory industry, the consolidation has never impacted the prices in a long run. (maybe, just a short-term impact). As you know, Micron acquired Lexar a few years ago, but no impact," he adds.
Is there any possibility of SanDisk delaying its production ramps and investments at two of its fabs? And, what will happen should it do so?
Nam says: "SanDisk has already said that they would delay its investment and capacity plan given difficult market condition. This is a positive sign to the market as we expect slower supply growth than expected in future. However, in a long run, consolidation won't impact the market up and down."
Negative impact likely for Toshiba?
Lastly, what happens to the SanDisk-Toshiba alliance, should the Samsung buyout of SanDisk does happen?
Nam adds: "It is negative to Toshiba. The company [Toshiba] not only loses its technology partner, but also loses its investment partner. It should be burden for Toshiba to keep investing themselves to grow its business."
Well, in SEMI's Fab Forecast Report, there is mention of how Toshiba and SanDisk are among the big spenders in fabs, in Japan. Considering that Japanese semiconductor manufacturers are more cautious, it would be interesting to see how this deal, should it happen, affects the Toshiba-SanDisk alliance.
Now, AMD goes fab-lite?
While on fabs, this brings me to the other big story of last week -- of AMD going the fab-lite route, possibly!
Magma's Rajeev Madhavan had commented some time back that fab-lite is actually good for EDA. It means more design productivity. Leading firms such as TI, NVIDIA, Broadcom, etc., are Magma's customers.
Late last year, Anil Gupta, MD, India Operations, ARM, had also commented on some other firms going fab-lite! Gupta pointed out Infineon, NXP, etc., had announced Fab-Lite strategies. Even Texas Instruments was moving to a Fab-Lite strategy. "IDMs are going to be the fabless units of today and tomorrow," he added.
So much for those who've taken the fab-lite route, and industry endorsements.
On the fab-lite subject, iSuppli's Kim will not speculate whether AMD would actually break up into into two entities: design and manufacturing, and also prefers to wait and watch.
How does fab-lite actually benefit? He comments: "Fab-lite has not been working well in the memory industry, which requires very tight control. It works, IF two companies (an IDM and a foundry) work very closely. For example, the industry leader, Samsung, produces all of the memory alone without any foundry relationship."
Watch this space, folks!
a) A possible acquisition of SanDisk by Samsung, and
b) A possible chance of AMD taking the fab-lite route.
First on Samsung's buyout (possible) of SanDisk! There have been rumors of a possibility of Samsung acquiring SanDisk. While it is still a possibility, it also leads to several interesting questions!
Should this deal happen, what will be the possible implications for the memory market? Will this also lead to a possible easing off on the pricing pressures on the memory supply chain? And well, what happens to the Toshiba-SanDisk alliance?
A couple of weeks back, iSuppli, had highlighted how Micron had managed to buck the weak NAND market conditions, and was closing the gap with Hynix in Q2, and that NAND recovery was likely only by H2-2009.
I managed to catch up again Nam Hyung Kim, Director & Chief Analyst, iSuppli Corp., and quizzed him on the possible acquisition of SanDisk by Samsung.
A caution: Remember, all of this is merely based on speculation!
On the possibility of Samsung's takeover of SanDisk, he says: "Samsung at least said that they consider it. Thus, it is a possible deal. But who knows!"
Kim is more forthright on the implications for the memory market, should this deal happen, and I tend to agree with him.
Consolidation inevitable; no impact on prices
The chief analyst quips: "The NAND flash market is still premature and there are too many players in flash cards, USB Flash drives, SSD, etc. The industry consolidation should be inevitable in future."
So, will this possible buyout at least ease some pricing pressures on memory supply chain? "I don't expect this deal to impact the prices. Prices will depend on suppliers' capacity plans. In the memory industry, the consolidation has never impacted the prices in a long run. (maybe, just a short-term impact). As you know, Micron acquired Lexar a few years ago, but no impact," he adds.
Is there any possibility of SanDisk delaying its production ramps and investments at two of its fabs? And, what will happen should it do so?
Nam says: "SanDisk has already said that they would delay its investment and capacity plan given difficult market condition. This is a positive sign to the market as we expect slower supply growth than expected in future. However, in a long run, consolidation won't impact the market up and down."
Negative impact likely for Toshiba?
Lastly, what happens to the SanDisk-Toshiba alliance, should the Samsung buyout of SanDisk does happen?
Nam adds: "It is negative to Toshiba. The company [Toshiba] not only loses its technology partner, but also loses its investment partner. It should be burden for Toshiba to keep investing themselves to grow its business."
Well, in SEMI's Fab Forecast Report, there is mention of how Toshiba and SanDisk are among the big spenders in fabs, in Japan. Considering that Japanese semiconductor manufacturers are more cautious, it would be interesting to see how this deal, should it happen, affects the Toshiba-SanDisk alliance.
Now, AMD goes fab-lite?
While on fabs, this brings me to the other big story of last week -- of AMD going the fab-lite route, possibly!
Magma's Rajeev Madhavan had commented some time back that fab-lite is actually good for EDA. It means more design productivity. Leading firms such as TI, NVIDIA, Broadcom, etc., are Magma's customers.
Late last year, Anil Gupta, MD, India Operations, ARM, had also commented on some other firms going fab-lite! Gupta pointed out Infineon, NXP, etc., had announced Fab-Lite strategies. Even Texas Instruments was moving to a Fab-Lite strategy. "IDMs are going to be the fabless units of today and tomorrow," he added.
So much for those who've taken the fab-lite route, and industry endorsements.
On the fab-lite subject, iSuppli's Kim will not speculate whether AMD would actually break up into into two entities: design and manufacturing, and also prefers to wait and watch.
How does fab-lite actually benefit? He comments: "Fab-lite has not been working well in the memory industry, which requires very tight control. It works, IF two companies (an IDM and a foundry) work very closely. For example, the industry leader, Samsung, produces all of the memory alone without any foundry relationship."
Watch this space, folks!
Labels:
Anil Gupta,
ARM,
Christian Gregor Dieseldorff,
DRAM,
Fab-Lite,
fabless,
fabs,
IDM,
iSuppli,
Magma,
memory,
Nam Hyung Kim,
NAND,
Rajeev Madhavan,
Samsung,
Sandisk,
SEMI,
Toshiba
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Staying ahead of clock a habit at Magma!
EDA is a complex industry to be in, what with process geometries changing all the time and EDA firms compelled to keep up with those changes. Magma Design Automation Inc. has been one of those, which has kept ahead of the changes and also managed good growth. In other words, Magma has managed to beat the clock consistently and stayed ahead, and continues to do so.
According to Rajeev Madhavan, chairman and CEO, Magma Design Automation Inc.. Magma has been outperforming the EDA industry by 2x globally. He touched upon the drive toward consumerization. Whle it was driven by PCs during the 1980s, mobile phones and PDAs are now the growth drivers for the common man. The consumer space is driving semiconductor applications as well. These are in form of devices with smaller form factors, where power is an important issue.
As an example, Madhavan highlighted the fact that 75 percent of the chips in the iPhone type of complex cell phone has been done using Magma. "We enable such points to happen. Consumer applications are driving EDA, and we are providing that change."
According to him, India is a major center for Magma. An entire business line of products are now being driven out of India. The physical verification units – DRC, etc., -- are all done here. Magma is consistently developing new products and product lines. Any MNC in India has an opportunity to build relationships with the EDA powerhouse.
EDA is all about integration. With operating margins getting slimmer, most companies have been moving to Fab-Lite. India has great expertise in design knowledge. India should shift its focus on developing the intellectual knowledge side, contended Madhavan. As for fabs, as and when those happen in India, they will definitely create jobs. "Fab-lite is actually good for EDA. It means more design productivity. Leading firms such as TI, NVIDIA, Broadcom, etc., are our customers," he said.
Magma is now looking at more value addition and faster development. It has covered the entire EDA domain. Magma has a culture of rewriting its software a lot more and also covers all new process geometries. According to Madhavan, Magma is constantly in touch with leading foundries such as TSMC.
It is said that right now, around 75 percent of the chips in 45nm currently use Magma. Magma is also working with a customer in 32nm. Madhavan said: "You have to develop the tools as the processes change. At Magma, we need smart people who can understand electrical engineering and computer science. Growth comes in identifying and building the talent pools.”
As for product lines developed in India, Magma's Quartz Formal has been developed largely in India. Most of the development work is happening in NOIDA, near Delhi. Work on DRC is being done out of Bangalore. “Every single product from Magma has some footprint in India,” he said. The complexities of chips have been growing and those require more automation.
Magma intends to grow from $178 million to $211 million during 2008. Madhavan felt that as the eco-system units come up in India, the company can move forward. Magma is hopeful that more design companies will be getting into India.
90nm designs major in India
Ricky Bedi, Senior Director, Application Engineering, Magma Design Automation India Pvt Ltd, added that the EDA industry had moved on from being optimizers. India too has to now move forward from being outsourcers to enablers.
He said, "When that happens, India will play a bigger role and offer more services. For example, Wipro, etc., are now doing full turnkey solutions." Magma India is now working with over 32 universities, regional engineering colleges (RECs), IITs, etc. The intent is to facilitate VLSI programs in all of those places.
However, he agreed that the innovation has not really kicked off in the country. As of now, 90nm designs are in the majority in India, and in comparison, 65nm designs are lesser. Magma has already gone into 45nm, and even into 32nm. Bedi said: "Right now, yield is imperative in 45nm. Innovation will continue in the smaller geometries. Innovation has to focus more on predictability, etc."
There is another trend worth mentioning -- about re-usable IPs. According to Magma, there will be even more of re-usable IPs. As the designs themselves get complex, designers need to achieve those in shorter timeframes as the time-to-market (TTM) is crucial. Replication of blocks is also happening. Implementation of re-usable IPs will go up a notch, added Bedi.
While the EDA tools are now catching up with the advances in semiconductors, it has not been smooth sailing for language. Bedi added: "As far as language is concerned, language itself does not blend so easily. It takes great effort to move from Verilog to VHDL."
Yatin Trivedi, director, Industry Partnership Program, Design Implementation Business Unit, Magma Design Automation Inc., touched upon the aspect of power. He said: "In the EDA format, it is important that the power format is accepted by as many vendors. The difference should be in the usage, not the format. In any design flow -- from RTL to GDS -- any design that is implemented must be simulated. Power information is now an integral part of the design. Leakage can destroy a die."
According to Rajeev Madhavan, chairman and CEO, Magma Design Automation Inc.. Magma has been outperforming the EDA industry by 2x globally. He touched upon the drive toward consumerization. Whle it was driven by PCs during the 1980s, mobile phones and PDAs are now the growth drivers for the common man. The consumer space is driving semiconductor applications as well. These are in form of devices with smaller form factors, where power is an important issue.
As an example, Madhavan highlighted the fact that 75 percent of the chips in the iPhone type of complex cell phone has been done using Magma. "We enable such points to happen. Consumer applications are driving EDA, and we are providing that change."
According to him, India is a major center for Magma. An entire business line of products are now being driven out of India. The physical verification units – DRC, etc., -- are all done here. Magma is consistently developing new products and product lines. Any MNC in India has an opportunity to build relationships with the EDA powerhouse.
EDA is all about integration. With operating margins getting slimmer, most companies have been moving to Fab-Lite. India has great expertise in design knowledge. India should shift its focus on developing the intellectual knowledge side, contended Madhavan. As for fabs, as and when those happen in India, they will definitely create jobs. "Fab-lite is actually good for EDA. It means more design productivity. Leading firms such as TI, NVIDIA, Broadcom, etc., are our customers," he said.
Magma is now looking at more value addition and faster development. It has covered the entire EDA domain. Magma has a culture of rewriting its software a lot more and also covers all new process geometries. According to Madhavan, Magma is constantly in touch with leading foundries such as TSMC.
It is said that right now, around 75 percent of the chips in 45nm currently use Magma. Magma is also working with a customer in 32nm. Madhavan said: "You have to develop the tools as the processes change. At Magma, we need smart people who can understand electrical engineering and computer science. Growth comes in identifying and building the talent pools.”
As for product lines developed in India, Magma's Quartz Formal has been developed largely in India. Most of the development work is happening in NOIDA, near Delhi. Work on DRC is being done out of Bangalore. “Every single product from Magma has some footprint in India,” he said. The complexities of chips have been growing and those require more automation.
Magma intends to grow from $178 million to $211 million during 2008. Madhavan felt that as the eco-system units come up in India, the company can move forward. Magma is hopeful that more design companies will be getting into India.
90nm designs major in India
Ricky Bedi, Senior Director, Application Engineering, Magma Design Automation India Pvt Ltd, added that the EDA industry had moved on from being optimizers. India too has to now move forward from being outsourcers to enablers.
He said, "When that happens, India will play a bigger role and offer more services. For example, Wipro, etc., are now doing full turnkey solutions." Magma India is now working with over 32 universities, regional engineering colleges (RECs), IITs, etc. The intent is to facilitate VLSI programs in all of those places.
However, he agreed that the innovation has not really kicked off in the country. As of now, 90nm designs are in the majority in India, and in comparison, 65nm designs are lesser. Magma has already gone into 45nm, and even into 32nm. Bedi said: "Right now, yield is imperative in 45nm. Innovation will continue in the smaller geometries. Innovation has to focus more on predictability, etc."
There is another trend worth mentioning -- about re-usable IPs. According to Magma, there will be even more of re-usable IPs. As the designs themselves get complex, designers need to achieve those in shorter timeframes as the time-to-market (TTM) is crucial. Replication of blocks is also happening. Implementation of re-usable IPs will go up a notch, added Bedi.
While the EDA tools are now catching up with the advances in semiconductors, it has not been smooth sailing for language. Bedi added: "As far as language is concerned, language itself does not blend so easily. It takes great effort to move from Verilog to VHDL."
Yatin Trivedi, director, Industry Partnership Program, Design Implementation Business Unit, Magma Design Automation Inc., touched upon the aspect of power. He said: "In the EDA format, it is important that the power format is accepted by as many vendors. The difference should be in the usage, not the format. In any design flow -- from RTL to GDS -- any design that is implemented must be simulated. Power information is now an integral part of the design. Leakage can destroy a die."
Labels:
EDA,
EDA Tools,
low power design,
Magma,
Semiconductors,
Verilog,
VHDL
Monday, January 14, 2008
Indian designers could lead in EDA product development
There will be the multi-nationalization of the product development process, according to Walden C. Rhines, chairman & CEO, Mentor Graphics. More executives recognize that "access to qualified personnel" is the key driver. As per A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index 2007, India is the most attractive offshoring destination. He was speaking at the Though Leadership Forum organized by the India Semiconductor Association.Touching on the evolution of EDA, and the role of Indian designers, Rhines said that most electronic engineers did not consider themselves "risk takers". Most electronic engineers also don't like to change tools and fewer even consider "hot" new tools.
On the contrary, young engineers and recent university graduates eagerly adopted new technology. It is a way for them to distinguish themselves, get the productivity advantage and they were less invested in existing methodologies.
Indian designers smart
Comparing Indian designers with the rest of the world, he said that electronic designers in India, on an average, are less experienced than in the United States, Europe and Japan. However, they are on an average, as smart, or smarter, than those in United States, Europe and Japan. There has been an increasing influence of India design centers on the multinational design flows and tools.
Disruptive change creates leadership opportunities. There has been improved power and cost through improved system architecture. The C synthesis enables faster architectural exploration and shorter time to Verilog.
C synthesis matches or exceeds hand coded RTL efficiency, as per STMicroelectronics (Reed-Solomon, Galois Field Multiplier). There have also been system architectural innovations to reduce die size -- Ericsson mobile platforms. There is a need to iterate to find the optimum architecture.
Now, Indian designers have been early adopters of C-based design. The reasons were, one there was a willingness to try new approaches and two, it caused multinational parent companies to accelerate their own adoption.
India is likely to be a leader in transaction level design. They have been able to extract fast, accurate power and timing models from RTL. They have managed runs 100x-1000x faster vs. RTL, retained accuracy at the gate level and RTL, their models run with application software for hardware/software cosimulation, and they have done transaction-based verification using emulation. It has been the same for UPF-compatible verification.
Some other areas of verification where India may lead the way are assertions, coverage based verification, and algorithmic test bench synthesis.
Adoption of place and route technology
Let us see how the adoption of new place and route technology has influenced the industry. When a design flow breaks, what breaks the most often? Place and route breaks every two technology generations. Technology generations ramp to peak volume. Place and route utilizes a semiconductor company's internal software until gate array routers emerge.
Cell-based layout requires hierarchical router with timing. Tangent attacks leading-edge 0.75 micron designs. Later, Cadence became the dominant place and route supplier at 0.35 micron as the fabless industry grew demand. [Cadence acquired Tangent in 1989]. However, at 0.25 microns, SoC drives new technology requirements. This led to the collapse of the FAM business model.
SoC needs "break" the flow. ArcSys emerged at 0.35/0.25 micron. It addresses SoC requirements for large sizes and interconnect delay. It goes public as Avant!, and is later acquired by Synopsys. However, a timing closure crisis emerges at 0.13 micron. Cadence and Avant!/Synopsys try to extend older tool architectures.
Now, timing closure "breaks" the design flow. At this point, Magma emerges at 0.13 micron with timing-driven layout solution. At 90nm, Magma dominates timing-driven design. It also approaches Cadence, Avant!/Synopsys place and route market share. What the industry witnesses is that a new problem emerges and a new, leading-edge solution provider enters every two nodes.
And now, pressures are creating 65/45nm discontinuity. These are process and design variations, low-power requirements, and large design data sizes. Explosive growth in complexity requires multi-corner, multi-mode analysis.
Achieving power/performance design goals requires analysis of corner cases for manufacturing and operational variability. Manufacturing variability multiplies the required corner cases. Hence, manufacturing variability now "breaks" the place and route flow at 65nm. With the advent of 45nm, it demands design for manufacturing (DFM), and ushers in more corners.
Implications for EDA in India
So what are the implications for EDA in this scenario, especially from an Indian context? One, introduce and support leading-edge design tools in India. Two, EDA startups will focus initial sales efforts in San Jose and India. Three, purchasing decisions will increasingly incorporate India design teams to drive flows and decisions. Four, India will emerge as the test bed for new design ideas. As a result, Indian designers would exercise their influence by demanding the best-in-class design tools and capabilities.
Indian designers should always remain open to new design approaches. They should beware of becoming risk adverse as they become more experienced. They should need to stay abreast of the emerging innovations by maintaining close contact with EDA companies, including start-ups. They also need to make EDA suppliers aware of their issues and challenges.
Labels:
Cadence,
chip design,
EDA,
EDA Tools,
India,
Indian chip designers,
Magma,
Mentor Graphics,
Synopsys,
Walden C. Rhines
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Are EDA tools a commodity?
I had the pleasure of attending the 20th International Conference on VLSI Design and 6th International Conference on Embedded Systems in Bangalore, and had the good fortune of meeting a range of top experts from these fields.
One panel discussion: "Are EDA technology/products becoming a commodity?", particularly caught my attention. Speakers debated on whether commoditization of EDA tools was happening with little/no differentiation toward project success.
Dr. Anand Anandkumar, managing director, Magma India, also a good friend, elucidated that the semiconductor design industry cannot do a complex SoC without EDA. And if there’s no EDA, there’s no integration. "If you are a commodity, you cannot solve problems!”
Now EDA is a key driver for semiconductor design companies to achieve objectives of building more and more complex (SoCs). However, the overall market size of EDA industry [estimated at US $4 billion] remains a fraction of the overall semiconductor market size [estimated at US $240 billion].
Dr Anandkumar added there had been various paradigm shifts and problems. The EDA industry was in a way the IP partner with the semiconductor industry. However, he agreed that parts of the tools had been commoditized. The EDA industry had become a prisoner of its own business model.
Nevertheless, newer things have been racing forward. There are also a variety of conflicting problems. Understanding those problems could be a way of handling and solving complex designs. The part of taking over risks had been completely absent. There was little ownership in sharing risks, which needed to change.
From the perspective of consumer electronics eco-system, available EDA technology is often viewed as not being in sync with the expectations and requirements of various design teams. Claims of productivity and quality of results advantages from EDA teams can seem more like wishful thinking than reality to end users.
More so, related issues of quality, inter-operability of standard formats, usability and understanding of designer needs are other areas of ongoing concern. These are not necessarily new issues, so what were EDA companies and their customers doing to address them? Has the EDA industry been getting its proportional value out of the semiconductor industry? Would love to hear from you.
One panel discussion: "Are EDA technology/products becoming a commodity?", particularly caught my attention. Speakers debated on whether commoditization of EDA tools was happening with little/no differentiation toward project success.
Dr. Anand Anandkumar, managing director, Magma India, also a good friend, elucidated that the semiconductor design industry cannot do a complex SoC without EDA. And if there’s no EDA, there’s no integration. "If you are a commodity, you cannot solve problems!”
Now EDA is a key driver for semiconductor design companies to achieve objectives of building more and more complex (SoCs). However, the overall market size of EDA industry [estimated at US $4 billion] remains a fraction of the overall semiconductor market size [estimated at US $240 billion].
Dr Anandkumar added there had been various paradigm shifts and problems. The EDA industry was in a way the IP partner with the semiconductor industry. However, he agreed that parts of the tools had been commoditized. The EDA industry had become a prisoner of its own business model.
Nevertheless, newer things have been racing forward. There are also a variety of conflicting problems. Understanding those problems could be a way of handling and solving complex designs. The part of taking over risks had been completely absent. There was little ownership in sharing risks, which needed to change.
From the perspective of consumer electronics eco-system, available EDA technology is often viewed as not being in sync with the expectations and requirements of various design teams. Claims of productivity and quality of results advantages from EDA teams can seem more like wishful thinking than reality to end users.
More so, related issues of quality, inter-operability of standard formats, usability and understanding of designer needs are other areas of ongoing concern. These are not necessarily new issues, so what were EDA companies and their customers doing to address them? Has the EDA industry been getting its proportional value out of the semiconductor industry? Would love to hear from you.
Labels:
EDA,
India,
Magma,
Pradeep Chakraborty,
Semicondutors
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
